Thursday, July 09, 2009

Remembering Giants Stadium: August 31, 1997

Just a quick note before I unveil the latest memory in my series. I’m starting to receive some great fan submissions that share the personal side of the game. These are stories of families who attend their first game together or who were there to witness a game defining moment.

I will be running the fan memories once we start the season, so please don’t hesitate to share your memories with me. I think, in fact, many of the fan submissions are going to pleasantly surprise a lot of people.


December 13, 1998: Giants 20 – Denver 16
In just my second season with Inside Football, I caught this one from the press box. What was so significant about this game is that the Giants ruined Denver’s quest for a perfect season. In that game, Amani Toomer caught the winning touchdown with less than a minute left to cap a game that I believe gave me my first gray hairs.

Special Report: A Look at the 2009 Rule Changes

The following is a special presentation prepared by the “Ref,” who authors our "Ask the Official" column. In this piece, the Ref looks at the new rule changes for 2009, with special attention on the points of emphasis. Anyone who has any questions about these points isinvited to send them to the Ref for clarification.  -- PT

* * *

It’s been awhile since we took a look at the new NFL rules for the 2009 season, so with training camps set top open I a matter of weeks, we thought it was a good time to take another look at them as well review the “Points of Emphasis: to which the officials are supposed to pay special attention.

Starting with the 2009 season:  

* A blindside block cannot be delivered to an opponent's head or neck with a helmet, shoulder or forearm. This will be a 15-yard penalty. This should take away some of the blindside shots that evoke ‘oohs and aahs’ from the fans, but leave a player lying on the ground. Expect this foul to be called early and often until the players get the message.

* Contact to the head of a defenseless receiver will draw a 15-yard penalty. The rule-makers are intent on taking the cheap shots out of the game. It may take awhile, but eventually the players will get the message. 

*  A defensive player on the ground may no longer lunge or dive at the quarterback's lower legs. This will probably become known as the "Brady Rule." If you're going to sack a quarterback, you have to do it while you're standing. It means that once a DL is knocked down, his primary goal must be to get back to his feet, not to continue to go/crawl after the QB. This is going to be a tough one for the Referee to call. The main issues will be how upright the DL will need to be and whether the DL is still in contact with the ground. This rule change may cut down on QB sacks and make it easier for OL to block the DLs. Expect to see more DLs pushed to the ground as they go after the QB.  

Forming a "wedge" on a kickoff return is no longer legal. If three or more players line up or attack shoulder-to-shoulder within two yards of each other, it will be a penalty. Traditionally, kickoff return teams lined up to four guys in a wedge in front of a kick returner. Meanwhile, the kicking team sent one or two players down the field, running as fast as they can, with instructions only to hit the players in the wedge as hard as they can. The owners determined this tactic was causing too many injuries. This is going to be a tough call on the part of the officials and it will likely bring back a number of long kick-off returns. The premium will now be on speed and elusiveness of the returner with blocking secondary. 

* On onside kicks, the kicking team can't have more than five players bunched together on one side of the kicker. Too many players were getting hurt on onside kicks when you had seven attacking seven. Now the numbers will be less and the likelihood of injuries lessened. Probably fewer onside kicks will be recovered as well. Look for more “pooch” kicks and/or kickers changing direction just before the kick and less chaos on this type of play. This will be a five-yard penalty. 

* Loose balls that may have been the result of a fumble or an incomplete pass are now subject to video review. This will probably be known forever as "The Hochuli Rule." The key things to remember here are that: a) the defense needs to recover the ball virtually immediately; and b) no advance can be made with the ball even if it is subsequently ruled that it should have been called a fumble rather than an incomplete pass. Expect the Referee to hold his whistle a bit longer than was the case in the past, which could result in additional late hits on the QB. Remember, there still needs to be indisputable evidence for the call to be over-turned. This is one of, if not the, hardest calls made by the Referee, and I don’t expect that the new rule will result in too many overturns during the season

* Video replay can be used to determine if a loose ball stayed in bounds or hit the sideline. This one stems from a play in the NFC championship game when the view of the deep official was blocked and a kickoff was ruled to have gone out of bounds when it didn’t. This one has hardly ever come up in the past and I don’t expect it will come up too often in the future.  

* No more re-kicks after an illegal onsides kick (i.e., kick goes out of bounds or someone on the kicking team touches the ball before it travels the necessary 10 yards, etc.). It immediately becomes the other team's ball. In the past, the kicking team got a second chance and there was an additional train wreck while the kicking team attempted to recover the ball. This one is common sense. Why reward a team’s failure to make a legal kick? 

* If a fumble or lateral goes out of bounds, the clock will stop only until the referee signals ready for play. In the past, the clock started on the snap in these situations possibly rewarding a team that forced the ball out of bounds on purpose.


Administrative rules changes include:

* The draft order will include playoff results as well as the regular-season records.  So the more wins a team has, the lower it will draft.

There's a new waiver period during the first two weeks of training camp, and the postseason waiver period will begin after the NFL's final game, whether it is the Pro Bowl or the Super Bowl.

Mike Pereira, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, and the two heads of the competition committee -- Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay and Tennessee Titans coach Jeff Fisher – have repeatedly emphasized that the players sought many of the rule alterations.

Pereira, who is retiring after this season, indicated that one major concern is the lack of progress in curbing horse-collar tackles. There were 24 called in 2008, up from 12, but there also were 47 league fines handed out for them.

"That's just too high a number," Pereira said. "We have not been effective in terms of stopping the tactic." Such tackles will be a point of emphasis with officiating crews in 2009 and expect this foul to be called more often. It needs to be remembered that the tackled player must go immediately to the ground for it to be a considered a “horse collar” tackle.

Holding penalties will be another “Point of Emphasis.” The variance of calls from crew to crew has been too great as far as the league is concerned. A tape has been compiled by the league office that will be shown to officials, coaching staffs and players. I expect that there will be more Offensive Holding penalties called, especially early in the season.

Other Points of Emphasis will continue to be safety related violations and Unsportsmanlike Acts by players including demonstrations following touchdowns, sacks, etc.

In the ratings for each crew last year, the officiating crews averaged 98.1 percent accuracy, down slightly from 98.3 in 2007. Given that there are typically about 120-150 plays per game, this means that after careful review of the tapes, the Supervisors determined that no more than 1-2 plays were being “miscalled” in each game.

That includes calls that should have been made, the majority, and calls that should not have been made. As one goes across an entire season, the calls (or missed calls) typically tend to even out. As was previously indicated, Ed Hochuli’s crew had the highest overall rating of any crew last season. 

Before anyone starts complaining about the NFL turning into a “flag football” league, I would point out that: a) the Players Association participated in the discussions of the new rules and supported them whole-heartedly; and, b) there are no officials on the Rules Committee, which consists solely of Coaches and GMs, with the Owners approving the recommended changes. It is their game, their money, their assets, and, in the case of the players, their bodies. They want them protected and that is what the Rules Committee is doing.

It’s easy to watch the game and criticize how a game is officiated , but until you are willing to put your body and future on the line, I would hold the criticism. The NFL is no longer the same game played by Dick Butkus, Jack Tatum, Sam Huff, and others that played in the 50’s through the 70’s. Given the exorbitant salaries of the players (including upfront bonuses), the litigious nature of the U.S., the size of today’s players, and the role of the Players Union, the game will never be that way again.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Remembering Giants Stadium: August 1997

For this installment, I decided to share another personal memory, this from my first game as a member of the press. For those who have asked, I am saving the reader-submitted stories for the season. We really have some good ones and I can't wait to share them!

August 1997: I don’t remember the exact date – it was a preseason game -- but 1997 was the first year I was granted a season credential as part of a three-person team covering for Inside Football at the time, which also included the original founding Editor and a senior reporter.

I remember it well. We were in the “old” press box (where the club seats are today) and because I was a late addition to the IF game day detail, I didn’t even have a desk – I sat in a director’s chair.  A director’s chair, at the time, was put out to accommodate the overflow of press. 

Since then, I’ve had a regular assigned season seat in the press box. I am also on my fourth laptop computer and make every effort to stay ahead of the curve by using the available technology to make sure our coverage is the best it can be. 

Every once in a while I think back to the early days. When the founding Editor owned Inside Football, he often spoke about the times when he and his writers would sit in an all-night diner “writing” the newsletter. The copy was prepared by a typist using the old style tapes -- the founding Editor never typed his own stuff -- and the newsletter was assembled by hand via the cut-and-paste method.

Today it's all done on a  computer. The Internet has just been a godsend as far as transmitting information -- no more all-nighters in a diner! And this year, I’m looking forward to incorporating Twitter and my blog more into our game day and post game coverage as well as a few other new features we hope to make a part of our normal rotation.

Letters to the Editor: July 7, 2009

You totally misunderstood my last letter. I was referring to in-game look at me phony celebrations. Of course, they are entitled to use their vacation time as they wish as long as it is legal. – Frank C.

Frank, I don’t mind it if a guy does a solo celebration that’s not over the top. I don’t see anything wrong with that as to score is a major achievement in sports. However, the more elaborate planned celebrations are just poor sportsmanship in my opinion. As for why coaches don’t take action against their players, think about it. If your top scorer performed “legal” celebrations every time he got into the end zone, would you honestly cut your nose off to spite your face?   Coaches put up with a lot when it comes to certain guys – just look at everything Tom Coughlin endured with Plaxico Burress between repeated fines, benching, lectures, etc. 

Following up on my LTTE of Monday: I am very disappointed in your choices for Giant Stadium remembrances. Since you've explained that you're presenting them chronologically and you are now into 1996 - - I guess the two world champions of 1986 and 1990 produced nothing memorable. I took your invitation to readers as a call for suggestions (of which I provided several on Monday) but now I guess you're asking the readers to write the copy as well. – Harvey F.

Harvey, I think every Giants follower can put the 1986 and 1990 seasons at the top of the list of fond memories.What makes these stories really special is that personal touch and the mention of an obscure game in which a son attended his first game with his dad on opening day, or a grandpa was surprised with a ticket for his 70th birthday.  I am really looking forward to launching the reader-submitted memories in the fall because some of them are really, really good. I hope, if you choose to continue reading, you’ll appreciate the personal stories that Giants fans have so kindly offered to share. 

The Boley suspension brings up a question of how thoroughly Reese et al research a potential free agent. If JR was aware of a Boley infraction, he must have believed the punishment, if any, would not be severe. On the other hand, he may not have been aware of a problem in which case, all the research in the world is not going to uncover everything about a player. Your thoughts please. – Robert T.

Robert, according to multiple reports, the Giants were aware of the possibility that the commissioner might suspend Boley. Hopefully he will be able to put it behind him quickly and become a productive member of the Giants’ defense. 

Giants LB Michael Boley Suspended for Season Opener

LB Michael Boley, who is recovering from hip surgery that will likely keep him out of most of training camp, was suspended without pay by the NFL for the team’s first regular-season game of 2009 for violating the league's Personal Conduct Policy. 

Boley’s suspension begins on Saturday, September 5.  He is eligible to return to the Giants’ active roster on Monday, September 14 following the team’s September 13 game against the Washington Redskins. 

Should Boley's recovery from the hip surgery enable him to get back on the field faster, he'd be eligible to participate in the team's preseason practices and games. However, he had the surgery on June 24 and the prognosis for his return is 8-10 weeks, so that doesn't appear likely. 

*** 1:40 PM UPDATE**Apparently the suspension is related to Boley's arrest in May 2008 on a domestic dispute. Also, for those wondering, if Boley is deemed physically unfit to play in the season opener, he will still need to serve the suspension just as soon as he's eligible to play again. 

This is only my opinion, but since he's probably going to miss all of training camp as he recovers from his hip surgery on June 24, my guess is he wouldn't have been ready to go on opening day anyway.

*** 2:10 PM UPDATE/CORRECTION** I apologize, but I was incorrect when I said that it didn't matter if Boley was physically ready to go in the first game. because if he was injured, he still would have been paid for the game. Since the suspension is WITHOUT pay, that means he will not be allowed to be at the team's facilities during the week of his suspension. What will probably happen is similar to last year, when Plaxico Burress was suspended. Burress was put on the Reserve-Suspended list and the Giants filled his roster spot. Once he was eligible to return to action, another set of transactions were made to reinstate Burress to the active roster.